To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [CBQ] Office cars |
From: | Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net> |
Date: | Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:04:15 -0600 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1362150258; bh=cTNnD7yV3boHCTR2DgLg/5n7ETSlhGOyGaw9g1DalHs=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-Id:X-Mailer:To:In-Reply-To:References:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=av4Ia8VxRSLPba6JxOTJ1P2N6ZF7dpnK9Z1RGr6/rYbAKum0nkJBdCaIIkyroRwvF/QaiH+1Iyw8HEU8q/oNtQNlWV2Ic0rtVf7XWbLl+/IBZhUuT+70Rus8UnsmImIkjAoYTbB1XSPALnPkYMuDqX9X7zNqhMT5fxgsLqTBzAc= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=cIAsXpjnDnsJsLVZGxZSvlEcVJj40FLsNBcK1041htsXqF4f3kDB9F7XSGxKLqxXF/uVTCBQ7F2c2ntq/Tz94Dy1hivs19eQvSA5UiJNN1CPJgCIi9RAedgwt6ehr0IRMtWJjfqEFR+R8E8Jg4PXN+eaKwxoJTYw4Fb12RlehXo=; |
In-reply-to: | <BAY173-W26A3687DC5AC2D96B65EA4CAFF0@phx.gbl> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <6BB99DD7-21E4-4D1B-B3B8-63EA73297F44@surewest.net> <BAY173-W26A3687DC5AC2D96B65EA4CAFF0@phx.gbl> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Not office cars, but there are photos and consists with a CZ obs behind the baggage car in an otherwise normal CZ and on a WP special. The car was running "backwards" in both cases, used mostly as a lounge in the special, a DH on the CZ. I wonder if they didn't ballast the baggage car - WP often did by using water in the tanks, especially if the car was "light" and not "working". They certainly did that for the exhibit trains. I've not found any information on the use of the water capability for its original intent (supplying extra water for the steam generators). The NP also had "water baggage" cars. Not sure of their use either. Post '68 I believe there were instances of (unoccupied) DH cars for Burlington put on the tail of the DZ. At 08:46 AM 3/1/2013, you wrote: It was pretty much a hard and fast rule that office cars ran behind the headend cars on any train that had an observation car -- blunt-end or round-end. That changed in 1968, and office cars began to be operated behind observation cars on the rear of trains -- except for the CZ, where they continued on the headend until the train was discontinued (since the CZ round-ends had no rear diaphragms to help stabilize a trailing car. __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Office cars, HOL WAGNER |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Office cars, Cy Svobodny |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Office cars, HOL WAGNER |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Office cars, Cy Svobodny |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |