BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Polo,IL

To: cbq@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Polo,IL
From: qutlx1@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:18:50 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1361992742; bh=vMMVM5iYd2poihDEyxjgPj/+68J33FpY5MS7szbRpCA=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Full-name:Message-ID:To:X-Mailer:x-aol-global-disposition:X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=itno+JM30o3qMCGzsjG8MImCI8LlvRY6kt8LzxgeDyzDNytPjNLyNlqkIqKUqJGNcvMKPPFCffIiTLr4ciT9eFiJoCNX5ghXh8ERvtNNqDNUiIHU/tVuHi4FY91ooTZ2tSW/b1yw5M5iUenb11JttbAScR/LV0nJNlaFJx+CK54=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=3zz22N/mhdOM/I0BI3AL/GldBvE0rZxsFUmiI8RT1IYMR8qRi6X8GvXqYOIy7DjQ5T+PAJt3Ls/q4w49tKstVPuBb/WY3+wyjH0wfhiIWnBuPN6uVNAMiN6AswE0uK+8hQjmjY3X5G8l+KV/FlTeOnq7SDvLoV3mE+6QjEnT6RM=;
Full-name: QUtlx1
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


As usual while looking for something,I found a nugget that was totally unrelated but still interesting so I'll share it. I think some may enjoy the insight.
 
In 1913 the elevator at Polo,IL brought a case before the Illinois Railroad and Warehouse Commission. The complaint was that the elevator shipped an average of 41 loads of grain a year over the I.C. to Chicago and was unhappy with the length of time the service consumed as well as the fact that in Chicago there were additional switch charges to get the cars to the elevators and the I.C. would not absorb them.
 
So the Polo elevator had asked the IC/Q to build an interchange track at Polo so they could send the cars via the Q after being loaded on the IC. The reason for this request was that the elevator was sure the Q provided better service and would absorb the switch fees in Chicago.
 
Both RRs refused and after paying what must have been some hefty legal fees, as the case was presented at length to the commission the Polo elevator lost. The commission noted the grade separation between the carriers at Polo and the estimated cost of $11,000 to build the proposed interchange track. It was also noted that there had never been an interchange trk at that location.
 
Leo Phillipp
 
 


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CBQ] Polo,IL, qutlx1 <=