To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Clear over Red Mars Lights on hood units |
From: | "smokyjoe66" <js08ws62@sbcglobal.net> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:23:17 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1357334599; bh=SuBV7Y3NFS67U5LU4ileFWN8UbbV/Z3NAnvocN/bQUA=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ph9NiMjGbAaQNXGe7E5JzrbnuqaD1y4r4Eyxz8I1N+4p1UcvkzDtLHTjD8oJ05AiOiu6lU3LXzo2liypIy2vDYKUQ4CuBBVHU4C2CQ3lmk7o1EA5skivKmxHRBQMMITNNeqjcTTCHBZ5ahxbqXN8lxCdVEm4vE0HWhUhu7gde0U= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=i65O5NFCVpC9YdQuukNVembBokCvc1+VmYcoBOzxK5d0HVb86KEP16H3o+YDHauCp7V29UDS/faUitdE+a+gzWiCM2ixb5RhOlQ3LRITAq01f8+SfUqa8zLnau+IMTGh0YPW4uQZvbcLY1pMAw/EzoF41ofCEnREiolIAVB14iA=; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
High on the ends of the early hood units just above the yellow over red stripe was a light housing unit which I have always understood to be a Mars light. It had 2 lamps and the lenses were clear over red. Intuitively one would reasonably assume that the red, being generally a more restrictive and urgent communication, would be in the more prominent "high" position, but pictures show otherwise. Why is this so? I have just had a professional modeler, customize and overhaul an Atlas GP7, and while he ( not a devoted CB&Q fan) was supplied with many color photographs of the prototype, and was clearly instructed to place the clear lens above the red lens, he did otherwise. To be sure, to my eye, that arrangement is more aesthetically pleasing... so I am not inclned to change it [ I have already spent over a year and a half on this project and it must end ] ?.. But it is not correct. Will welcome any comments about why the red lens is below the clear lens on the prototype. Thanks very much. I hope everyone has a great new year. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Signals, qutlx1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two, pal_houston |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: Country Elevator Operations [1 Attachment], Douglas Harding |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two, pal_houston |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |