|
I suspect that the apparent lighter color on the lower section is die to the use of orthochromatic film; panchromatic film would show the lower section to be darker, which would be logical. Art From: GENE TACEY <taceys@gpcom.net> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:00 PM Subject: RE: [CBQ] CB&Q depots I have a lot of photos of depots in this time frame and am also curious about the color separation line. Some photos show a lighter color on the lower section and some appear to be darker on the lower section. I think some of it may be due to the direction of the sun in relation to the photo. I heard a story from Jim Reisdorf who had talked to a painter who used to work for the Q and he told Jim they used to put sand in the paint on the lower part to prevent windblown dirt and sand from wearing the paint. I am guessing that this may have changed the reflective quality of the paint such as it appears to be a different shade. Would also be interested in an answer to this as to the best of my knowledge they were always painted the standard
colors. Gene Tacey From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Art Peterson Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:06 AM To: cbq@yahoogroups.com Subject: [CBQ] CB&Q depots I am working with real photo postcards of
CB&Q depots of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It is apparent that most of the wooden buildings were painted with a darker color to about five feet above the ground with a lighter color above that. If anyone has information on what these colors were, I would appreciate hearing from you. Art Peterson __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |