BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Question on expansion

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Question on expansion
From: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:20:06 +1200
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1343204408; bh=B7S5zYveRbqhwGP+bTFeWgeSkPFpv0mqQqYYgLNP7JU=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered:X-Cloudmark-SP-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qqj0hzasSJK+gpHrwgaaXVY9yMMCW9Xl15wZSyq5QX4UTvHuRg/s6c1tESYiN3jwNC2JwjYPw+NeEnIDpwrtFvVFVtTAiNZIqwt1ng9Bkj01NiTL+ATKOD4ifAmFyDPb
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=rKIQ0eU3XoW/+fX/L9qZWOtkeMiKP1XS+wXdkB1FpypLv2LK0X49AdA44v8vl3hOMdM4Li/R7OkeU+UDSP7KdqLS3LG+xuK36bMhsFpPahJdbXjCp+OKGRJtKT+qi92p;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <458595670-1343072306-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-358599133-@b12.c18.bise6.blackberry>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
The idea of the Burlington gaining its own connection to the Pacific coast was 
frequently mooted in the late 19th and early 20th 
centuries. For example, in 1878 the Engineering News reported -

It a current topic of talk in railroad circles that the Chicago, Burlington & 
Quincy are quietly negotiating to extend their road to 
California by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Road. As the managers of the 
latter road were formerly Chicago, Burlington & Quincy 
men, the "symptoms" are decidedly favorable to a breaking out in that direction.

Seven years later, the Engineering News of 1885 said -
Rumors are again current that the Burlington will soon begin work on its 
extension to the Pacific ocean. The latest route mapped out 
for the road from Denver is through Boulder Canyon, thence into Middle Park, 
tunneling the Continental divide under James Peak. This 
tunnel will be 9,000 feet long, the longest west of the Mississippi river. It 
strikes the Grand River Valley several miles below the 
mouth of the Blue, thence it proceeds down the Grand to Grand Junction, and 
through Utah and Nevada to California. Some work has 
been done on the grade in the Boulder canyon and Middle Park. The tunnel 
through James Peal will take at least two years to build.



In 1897, Railway Review stated -
According to press dispatches the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy will soon have a 
through line to the Pacific coast. This will 
necessitate the building of a line across Colorado from Lyons, the terminus of 
the Colorado branch, and run through Left Hand canyon 
in Boulder county, thence across the range to Routee county, tapping the Hahns 
Peak region, thence to Utah, passing through Ogden 
and ending at Salt Lake. The proposed route across Colorado was surveyed some 
time ago, and it will require but little work to 
replace the stakes that have been lost. At Salt Lake the road will connect with 
the Oregon Short Line and the Southern Pacific, thus 
allowing the Burlington to tap the entire Pacific coast.

Four years later, Railway Age commented -
Will the Burlington be extended to Salt Lake and to a connection for 
California? There are those who believe that Mr. Hill and his 
associates are interested in Senator Clark's enterprise for a new road between 
Salt Lake and Los Angeles, and that the Burlington 
will be the connecting link which will complete a system stretching from Puget 
Sound through Idaho, Utah, Nevada and California to 
San Diego Bay, with lines reaching down to the Gulf of Mexico and easterly to 
the great lakes.

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ





----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dhartman@mchsi.com>
To: "CBQ yahoo" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:38 AM
Subject: [CBQ] Question on expansion


> Does anyone have knowledge or an opinion: why didn't either Q or BN make a 
> play for DRGW/WP to get California access, and to keep 
> UP from monopoly?
>
> Doug
> 



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>