To: | "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] CB&Q HT-2 versus HT-5 |
From: | "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:25:54 -0800 (PST) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1327627557; bh=dC6FFiHhnTaVeiL4O+hQ6MjtDOVsZUXJfoIsbJvsSLc=; h=Received:Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:To:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=FUizU5jlYAKTb6tYzCx/zIB9KTXEFloJEa6rFpvMWnn20z8XwFixxnmUTomvjCDFcGIW072KEhYdf9Gwa3LTKd8XCgJaF3kUJdi+91cuPQRqSzDk4EN1ecsue+ucVIt4 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HS6ERtKM6rjrhqa/Kgu375C757A5otNSW5HS8Vc3MDhBp6/TAsFqcRht0/m3N8Enzbd39VR8Q1IAlem/ifjqzw7gf+CFp7l5gZRmbCAN7Nvn58JiQkPiSK7lvZNUL4+X; |
In-reply-to: | <A4DDBD022D3B4A08915131711D82EE36@BenPC> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <8CEA9B3239F195A-7FC-507BF@webmail-d170.sysops.aol.com> <1327532252.58478.YahooMailNeo@web121602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <A4DDBD022D3B4A08915131711D82EE36@BenPC> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
You need to get a copy of BB-35. It shows pictures of HT-2's and HT-5's. There was quite of bit of difference between them. From: de Vries <bjdevries01@onsbrabantnet.nl> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q HT-2 versus HT-5 Please forgive me my ignorance but I never before heard or saw anything
about the HT-1 or 2 so I wonder if these were earlier
versions of the HT-5 series, documented in Mike Spoor’'s CB&Q Color
Guide to Freight and Passenger Equipment. And if so,
were there dimensional differences? Are there any eqpmt diagrams
available of these types?
Ben de Vries, the Netherlands
From: John D. Mitchell, Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Aluninum Hoppers 190854 was a class HT-2 twin hopper that was almost an exact copy of
class HT-1 hopper car which in turn were almost copies of the USRA cars with the
exception of the hand brakes. So with a little work on the hand brake, you can
come pretty close. You should note that 190854 got Bettendorf trucks instead of
Andrews when rebuilt.
From: "richtownsend@netscape.net"
<richtownsend@netscape.net>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Aluninum Hoppers The only 55-ton aluminum CB&Q
hopper I know of was 190854, a rebuild of one of their 55-ton hoppers with the
side sheets in two parts. This was not a USRA
hopper.
Richard Townsend Lincoln City, Oregon -----Original
Message----- From: Paul K. <kozys@comcast.net> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wed, Jan 25, 2012 11:45 am Subject: [CBQ] CB&Q Aluninum Hoppers Greetings! Following is a link to Accurail models new products for January: http://tinyurl.com/7xjzuy9 Scrolling down the page you will see they are offering a 55-Ton USRA ALUMINUM hopper car. My question is did the 'Q have any of these cars in the period just prior to the merger? I'm familiar with the larger capacity 'silver sides' hoppers of that time but did they even make a 55T version in aluminum? And more importantly to my modeling, if so did the CB&Q have any of them as this model suggests? Thanks in advance for any info on these cars. =|===|= "Paul (Kossart) - The CB&Q Guy" =|===|= Peru, IL, *USA* =|===|= (Modeling Late 1960's in HO) __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] WTB Ambroid Burlington insulated 60' box car, prome1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] RE: WTB Ambroid Burlington insulated 60' box car - FOUND, Joe Atkinson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] CB&Q HT-2 versus HT-5, de Vries |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Aluninum Hoppers, STEVEN HOLDING |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |