BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge fixed spans

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge fixed spans
From: Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 11:49:56 -0700
Delivered-to: archives@venus.nauer.org
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1304275801; bh=kNQpoVyFoq6fNyWUqBcUDKFX/y/FqsCQYxCm3dfYotg=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-RC-FROM:X-RC-RCPT:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:In-Reply-To:References:Message-Id:To:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oTQPmCcN23UkPlscXyU7RbKCdCz1paoesLtGP/DNx2Ox7H6kH+kZhOAa4Z6fA/Q7bEtpwQs0orYFwI91dz3cCK7HrCS9yece0HfHkhO03SVpA+Nbh71fPvoM8SgZU0+K
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=A9XoyO4Ahn9BwsoZxi46rlFgHKCZ1eBXPYxDnYFI1spXqmn/95xmcEjgCd5loM8LsEN5hzlhOT1RtBaXQD+eNfjMBDMg8q1e2L9QloVsWlL5Aqz2BlpVh/sJhIXn/cAu;
In-reply-to: <ipjrkd+9kc5@eGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <ipjrkd+9kc5@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
In response to Bill's post a little historical perspective.

 From the magazine "Engineering and Contracting" Vol 30  page 380

"Weight of the Burlington Bridge of the C. B. & Q.

In 1890 a double track steel railway bridge was built across the  
Mississippi River, at Burlington, for the C, B. & Q. R. R., to  
replace a single track iron bridge built 22 years before. The 6 spans  
of 250 ft. each, weighed 3,340 lbs. per lin. ft. The draw span of 363  
ft. weighed 3,980 lbs. per lin. ft. The bridge was designed to carry  
a moving load of 6,000 lbs. per ft. of double track structure (3,000  
lbs. per ft. of single track), this load being increased 50% in  
estimating the variable effect of a moving load. The cost of  
engineering was 5% of the total cost of piers and superstructure."

Pretty good to be running modern diesels over it 120 years later.

Ken Martin




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>