BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] Employee TT's

To: <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Employee TT's
From: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:52:09 -0500
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1270144335; bh=0j7Hujhm7S3vZJdzGnxH57Hvj8rDvDNfQo+5B+fjlHM=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:Importance:In-Reply-To:References:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=b+RJ02Y7SYROKFVpiD0xg88NzTIfM8mI3yZGVN0GM6mRcxef/i9ipp47TGpCk6GjP1WBWht7CS7KAVghM2QHQa6uivKYBTtqXvLt9IfCb5nyU58vn2JsvGpnU/43EJg3
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=PL5tWLRN/61yQXDWcpEKeGYGmKTdJw9/rUw0wSQGMkEiJH0ra4MnSnP9rlBbM3Jnr1x9g6u65cuiyLzVTsqZ8NZsi1CAQztWCQnCqLolzry/G0jidqk/ZW/o6b+P7J9U;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <hp0dbm+kbig@eGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <hp0dbm+kbig@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Most RR's changed the color of the TT # each issue so at a glance you knew 
whether an Emp had the current issue: ie. today all 'blank' Div ETT's have RED 
#'s; any Emp with a GREEN # has an outdated issue.   As for numbering, they 
were done consecutively every time there was a change necessitated by 
new/revised  but went back to "1" when the territory covered by the Div 
changed.  I.E. with consolidations & fewer Divisions, the enlarged existing 
Divisions would re-start at #1.  For example the Chicago & Aurora Div. went 
back to #1 several times post-WWII as former Divs were rolled into it (like the 
LaCrosse).


Gerald  


 



To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
From: estcbq@aol.com
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:03:50 +0000
Subject: [CBQ] Employee TT's

  



what was the basis that the 'Q' designated the numbers and the color of the 
numbers on employee time tables---numbers that have shown range from 1-60's and 
colors of black-green-red--do the numbers and color have significant meaning of 
something---thanks---jim young




                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850552/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>