BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] RE: CB&Q / Colorado & southern

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] RE: CB&Q / Colorado & southern
From: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 08:24:11 -0600
References: <000101c2abb9$503bf000$9115c343@s...>
Reply-to: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>
I would say "yes" except between Denver and Pueblo. I do not know
what the AT&SF crew's attitude was about waycars but I would be
fairly certain that in the days of assigned waycars the crew would use
their own. That leads to a question:

Were any C&S waycars assigned to AT&SF Conductors?

Russ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "'Gordon Donaldson'" <GordonD@k...>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 December, 2002 17:36
Subject: [BRHSlist] RE: CB&Q / Colorado & southern


> Here's a question for all of our BRHSlist Subsidiary fans. My guess would
> have been they used C&S cabooses on C&S trains regardless of the motive
> power's ownership. Would I be right?
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Donaldson [mailto:GordonD@k...]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:07 PM
> To: brhs@n...
> Subject: CB&Q / Colorado & southern
> 
> 
> To whom it may concern:
> Would the CB&Q locomotives assigned to the C&S subsidiary have pulled C&S or
> CB&Q cabooses
> or either one? Any info on this would be appreciated. Thanks, Gordon
> Donaldson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>