BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: question (revised)

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: question (revised)
From: "dave_lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 04:02:10 -0000
In-reply-to: <v01510102b88513975a7e@[165.247.220.152]>
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
The only place I've heard it referenced was for trains across the 
Missouri rive Bridge at Sioux City. Burlington's trains were using 
the ageing Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha's Missouri River 
bridge at Sioux City, Iowa, the connecting link between the Q and the 
Great Northern. The pin-connected trusses of the bridge, built in 
1888, required weight restrictions, limiting movements over it to 
smaller locomotives and cars of 70-tons capacity or less. Longer 
trains had to be broken into sections for individual movement across 
the structure. Steam-powered "Pingers," powered by R4 and R5 Prairie 
locomotives running back and forth across the river, were the rule 
until the SD7's delivery in 1951. The Burlington's new SD7's, 
numbers 400-411, were ordered specifically for use on the O'Neil 
branch from Omaha to Sioux City. Read more about it in the upcoming 
Burlington Bulletin on the Q's SD7's and SD9's. (Shamelsss plug.)

Dave 
Lotz 

--- In BRHSlist@y..., jonathanharris@e... wrote:
> Does anyone know the origin of the term "pinger," applied to CB&Q 
transfer runs?
> 
> Jonathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>