| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CBQ] Oregon Signals |
| From: | herrick@krausonline.com |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:19:42 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | unknown |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1357006785; bh=a3SfPhaqbuOT8azUV2qi08pIEwmYay0Q+wSLlXsdyag=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NeyCJeGmqS8Q6ZLH5R13DEWLSZ10AojXxhgfFJgieRcH4yCC3Kp1aTdSgMLcJt4U7PmR0JGAE8izahEiu233248wPhGpB4s2z7jm4Dq9xlvK2VaP/UKW3vXUZ3loAh4Rylt/NwFy8WjeCB4RyAW4FPLvqI4W8WrHVNxyfpBLSFs= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=se7MfDSjO3llALMWFvAY41hzDk61V5X8ZSwMy4K9RIO+qFdLlBtE885tQov8mNNe2q4TblAbYoz4y/10HQw2ZbXj97a7EguOF3KNtXMHrgzJ6bRZZ/sKsr+g72+bWiJLDvXL6j2WcACv+sjmSn3XFDw6QnS8AGcMIgsoJwt4pz8=; |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
Years ago when I was researching operations at Rochelle, I exchanged emails
with Ron Copher about the signals there. He'd met a guy who was the agent in
Rochelle in the 1947-51 timeframe who said that the operator controlled the
signal at the coal chute board (an absolute signal in both directions) mainly
to protect passenger trains at the depot. He also had a lockout switch for an
eastbound move across the C&NW for the same purpose.
Did the operator at Oregon exercise the same control over signals? Also, the
1967 Oregon track chart shows that the switches at either end of the passing
track were "controlled." Were these controlled by the operator or the
dispatcher?
I also recall John Schmid saying that the "passing track" at Rochelle was not
used for that purpose, rather, meets were made at Shabonna and Chana.
Was this also true for Oregon, i.e. no meets?
Bob Herrick
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Oregon part 2, qutlx1 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Oregon Signals, STEVEN HOLDING |
| Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Oregon part 2, qutlx1 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Oregon Signals, STEVEN HOLDING |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |