| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CBQ] Re: Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power) |
| From: | "broken bolster" <therrboomer@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Aug 2012 04:01:36 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | unknown |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1344657700; bh=A/N7BVgHOx6JIJYW8tQ0hKw7XPD5cXXiI6qP7jW7NVA=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LrMXkoRN5bejSriSfXEsWYjJ3w+xRARI0/yjPDvWSn4Yg6LkzvrqncqgANSzf7z0rR9zyPjQAsQr5kU7nUU+sdtSqCKY4uTc9fiQZmopwLWnffZ/LwgxYRHqT6KCN+9Y |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=BTfS9h1r2Kys2eIYZv+qrYrD7/IDC4T8wbowCwWic15xo0fxnPxXlNA2f/cr4JAYd2JEvhiRzp+v3Z2TYpC3OAzj0HcZYIlITyHsX9+6H5G7Rvh7pD+rfO7/XtcoZshT; |
| In-reply-to: | <k00h3f+upmq@eGroups.com> |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
Believe UP CCS was west of North Platte. In the early '70's
just about any roads units could be seen leading east of NP
but not west.
Dick Haave
************************************
--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "thommack" <thommack@...> wrote:
>
> A friend of mine who is well acquainted with the Union Pacific brought up cab
> control signal (CCS) implications. This train would have needed UP style CCS
> from Grand Island to North Platte on the UP. He asked whether PRR or CB&Q
> required Cab Signal or ATS on freight for their sections? On westbound was a
> UP CCS leader added at Grand Island to replace the PRR one?
>
> I did not think CB&Q had cab signals in their freight units. The PRR might
> have for northeast operations, but I don't know.
>
> Can anyone shed light on this cab signal conundrum?
>
> Tom Mack
> Cincinnati, OH
>
> --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Larry" <lsallee@> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, now I've got another shot here
> > <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/UEEHSBgx_k4vY3l2bC_rStMTjNZETYmyP\
> > Jy0liipFm0?feat=directlink> I have questions about. Anyone
> > know/guess/speculate about what this train might have been and why it
> > would have had only PRR and UP power (and it looks like those two middle
> > engines are UP cabless units)?
> >
> > Larry
> >
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] C&S Trains #29 and #30, Dave Lambert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Re: Cab Signals, GLEN HAUG |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Cab Signals, GLEN HAUG |
| Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Foreign power, Rupert & Maureen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |