| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CBQ] Re: F unit combo? |
| From: | "bdurham260" <bdurham260@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 May 2012 00:01:45 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | unknown |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1336694508; bh=ZlYzqgxNh0Sjpv+PLLqEMcsheK5XOgOehb4HPquXLfM=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QLVexUUe1pGSB4MQBJ2w//Msj9bZDuhMYuNrGlbnx3VHmsT/wIZ0kuYn+foeCL7bblcPcK9aZ8tzP4vLBQGSgD0Uv0SZByQHKA7XaNaUJgcjjrnDKfFUPNHMwOdsEGMK |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=q3yjK7DL9eroZpFcApUzwrcsTNqcDNdTT2oXRUUapBu0bOFv30rU7mv9JwFX2qNCTh3sWM9PcNSX7W01IFd1zdkA3KN2W2Hg0QhlDsjn+Bm4fgp47x+5iic/d526rYZP; |
| In-reply-to: | <1336659160.83037.YahooMailNeo@web112005.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
That is a great picture!!
I appreciate the responses! I finally found my my FT A/B set!!! Now I have a
an orphan F7B unit that I need to decide if I want to keep and keep looking for
an A unit or look to sell it and reinvest the funds!
Brian Durham
--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, Karl Rethwisch <qrailroadman@...> wrote:
>
> One more on the subject of F units. Here's an example of an extreme
> combination of technology and horsepower. This was a not too uncommon
> lash-up in the early days of BN operations.
>
> To put the smaller, more short-time challenged unit in the lead, was the
> better of the two methods of running them. When the F45 was the lead unit an
> Engineer had to constantly monitor speed and throttle position in order to
> avoid serious thermal damage to the motors on the older engine.
>
> Karl
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Visiting Colorado, Paul Evans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CBQ] Sorry about calling them marker lights, burlington9900 |
| Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: F unit combo? [1 Attachment], Karl Rethwisch |
| Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Visiting Colorado, Zephyr fan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |