| To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108 |
| From: | "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:56:17 +1300 |
| Delivered-to: | archives@venus.nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1296194201; bh=DTSJPR6/9ObdX6LLiMI/s1tqKqvpOCM+4zUQ/OTkFBE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:x-mimeole:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hQVrkpAbRYz/LDiyUYARRA8V0Bc3tMOIKQRQ/dFwhAXFeO2CDgzUXK1GqrCIkwkM4egr5xrFs2ozWxF3VRu6U89DBSIc0FwxwM5vcUZzNIHDjN+17jsvKnHWuZHc/tWl |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HtC8dqkJyVv1lr5cedNGaZ1himAT84amJmrbNlcZNileOqdPS569WFaWTd4eDDiANvjJtirNTAmSzBSGqUhoIg+41m8syykscjKi4r/y9pyE6qygD91lMfkvjd1HIDwP; |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| References: | <62110.5b5064ed.3a723aa4@aol.com> <483534.474.qm@web82403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <8CD8C521C1F535E-1CE0-7360@webmail-m046.sysops.aol.com> <CB8E65739DD94EFC84046C57FB457807@STUDY> <8CD8CB80C5A2F68-1D18-59A8@Webmail-d116.sysops.aol.com> |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Pete
Thanks for the explanation. Hard to argue with!
Were there any specific rules about movement in fog or was Rule 108 relied on
to cover it?
Rupert
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com>
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rule 108
>
> Rupert et al...Rule 108 IS a summary.....Burlington Lines RULES OF THE
> OPERATING DEPARTMENT effective December 1, 1929...
>
> MOVEMENT OF TRAINS: 108 In case of doubt or uncertainty the safe course
> must be taken. That's it.
>
> The rule is one of those that has always been and still is...it was the same
> on all railroads.
>
> My grandfather always said of the Rock Port Langdon and Northern..."We only
> have one rule"....Proceed as the way is seen and known
> to be clear"
>
> Pete
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108, Jpslhedgpeth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Baldwin VO-1000 (cont), John Manion |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108, Jpslhedgpeth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108, Jpslhedgpeth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |