| To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CBQ] FT units question |
| From: | "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:10:54 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1288113175; bh=wSp0H7Qhu5aqZl9ksKw5r72MDn76HNtQ9GWty5D7+Sk=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:x-mimeole:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nqAJY0D5zku+yO9hoNpPh1Rv/hshaDUU3/WPfcpDMV9eIqfxEdraYb15Zo4cJNMFLCrHxJpYskIexx2SZD13gzbeEoru8o33h4VeEB20UgrSJYXo3sGN/pZC29Vj9ECN |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HMTuYfSllDrXZgcZIXq4TWKD4WfLmlfihbu8fe38WuY03aRMvnpjKKMv7UtUvGtTvgAmh4nfwYRh5yu6no82EqWybf6xH0t5yfA9PK+8yL3fHs7kES6cinXzrrfCI3Vr; |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| References: | <i9vi9f+av81@eGroups.com> |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
I don't think so. IIRC only ATSF FTs were delivered with couplers between the
units... they were designed to be drawbarred together. In fact, unless
specially equipped or modified FTA and FTB units could not work by themselves
because some shared components were in either the A or B unit.
On the CB&Q the units stayed drawbarred together... in fact, I think the FT/F2
sets were set up that way as well. The F2s were couplered at some point but
it appears that at least some, if not all, of them were in A-B-A FT/F2 sets
connected with drawbars. Not sure about the configuration of the FT A-B-B-A
sets as delivered.
Charlie Vlk
Were the FT's ever broken down into single units or just AB sets? I know they
started out with drawbars and there were some sets broken up and matched with
F2's.
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] C&S Passenger equipment north of Denver, homanfamily |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] First motor car, cvlk |
| Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] FT units question, Supplement Less |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] FT units question, John Manion |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |