| To: | "CBQ List" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CBQ] First motor car |
| From: | "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz> |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:39:49 +1300 |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1287805199; bh=CmEORxiKgUoGlAU6uvHibEpuh6NOUhxtE5SeeAhx0ds=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=paFSxBs2tjG9VGbmzq/9h9xsEZ9s8iYlTwj7RQ9lkjGVNg13TlcDh4MfDFtp0OCcOjB480/my8hP5VQ4z1qF95+o+YGfhbOELU2nyvP5pqlwdrAvG/EMhZVPGvmxuB7L |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=CL8688ibBir4G804x45fzoNkLLKCMtf+NKxKDQB+e29oZE+rup0omV8JAb6cHS0m3+ueCVKuFYYwAcLtR1sQnIKeCZ0GnBgqOeyHom/TdttYlM+F79AMhJNwdqD8kT0J; |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
We had a brief discussion back in August about the first (possibly first)
gasoline motor car. I've now found the following piece in an article (American
Engineer & Railroad Journal Sept. 1905 page 335) about motor cars, discussing
the different motive power options and costings of motor car operation.
"The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway has recently built a 225-h.p.
gasoline electric motor car designed to haul a trailer for carrying passengers,
the motor car itself being used for the power equipment, mail and baggage. A
test of this car was made recently, but as yet we have no figures on the actual
cost of operation."
Presuming this to be a reference to the same piece of equipment, it confirms
that this was railway equipment as opposed to a converted road vehicle.
Needless to say, if I find any published reports on the test, I'll let you know.
Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CBQ] re: FDR signed menu, ANDREW KOETZ |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] First motor car, Duncan Cameron |
| Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] re: FDR signed menu, ANDREW KOETZ |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] First motor car, Duncan Cameron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |