| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's |
| From: | "BrianA" <briannpman@comcast.net> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:16 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1270938989; bh=MucUO/+JvfTekn7NO+FMDv6lyR8e25afHGDRxeCuA1U=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YwHExsHtKacGkGi61MyrRBaRQXGOCoAyTumA9Gg4iTJLFnKVXAfCtkrYHBNBg/+ZjFzH0wwAipsDMsD3r3+5MCHzEZ5c/kElLfYaV620MReZGlqjkuYxg8p6DKvUkb01 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=QHSjaW4lbIMaKdtyd6MIxJT4t16Z1V346TMQuao3AykGwzTq9PDJlC4ly8TYE3663kWv8NPAZ+wEqyStnbQzCuMOocGcp64HPdtMohQ52LZeCvuFH7KGAgHJF2F+FX3p; |
| In-reply-to: | <335B9179B910454FBCBC57B733979151@STUDY> |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
That is actually pretty logical. As there were only 10 U28B's it is doubtful
they'd remain in solid sets after being delivered. In probably a week or two
after entering service they were scattered all over the CB&Q. From the
sightings you mentioned in the books they could be seen anywhere so may not
have actually been assigned to a particular terminal either.
Thanks for the help.
Brian Ambrose
Renton, WA
--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@...> wrote:
>
> Brian
>
> In Mike Spoor's CB&Q In Color books 2,3 and 4 are a number photos of U28B's,
> each of which shows them coupled to other units (as
> opposed to heading a freight by itself) but in none of them are they coupled
> to other U28B's. The four photos of the 106-115 group
> shows them in Galesburg (#114 - Volume 4 page 16), Burlington (#110 - Volume
> 3 page 53), Ottumwa (#106 - Volume 3 page 73) and Clyde
> (#108 - Volume 2 page 26)
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Rupert Gamlen
> Auckland NZ
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Re: Naperville Crash, Rupert & Maureen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's, bkobielusz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Question about the U28B's, Rupert & Maureen |
| Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's, bkobielusz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |