BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: The Ruling Grade at La Grange and other history tidbits

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: The Ruling Grade at La Grange and other history tidbits
From: "rrhistorian" <rrhistorian@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 03:35:54 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=LoOUWs8e+TO0S6TqtG61tyjbo2PgWPRrZbcCGedIfjTAkULYPldUIQL2GE5k2VGQ4EjdSh2fp1DcTyNtV6j5BN3QnPi36Xj4LaKxDyknMLV9l1kpqK5/q0rcPydC7bw5;
In-reply-to: <025d01c7c266$bb3b58f0$6401a8c0@rmr6a59add9e7c>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Hello all 

I have a question about "riots" between competing railroads - often at
the construction of junctions.  Does anybody here know if riot had a
different use in the late 19th century than it does today?  For
example, could this have been an exchange of shouts and jeers - or was
their out-and-out violence? 

It is hard to imagine any rivalrious construction crews being
motivated to violence at the present.   

Best,
Tom Cornillie


> 
> Another Chicago Tribune article about the same spot dated July 12,
1897 (almost 110 years ago!!!) reported when the Chicago, Hammond
> & Western did finally get to building though the area the Suburban
Electric (later West Towns Street Railway) was building into La Grange
> at the same time.   The newspaper report is not really clear but the
CH&W and SE construction forces got into a riot involving about 300
> workers from contractors for both lines.  The article reports the
scene of the conflict was in Hill Grove Avenue, east of the Burlington
depot.
> It later stated that the two companies had been battling over ROW
and that the "Bad feeling had been engendered by recent condemantion 
> proceedings in the County Court in which the CH&W officials got the
better of their rivals (by getting a ROW from SE for $7000 instead of 
> the $9000 the SE was willing to sell it for).
> It sounds like the actual issue was who was going to have to install
and maintain the crossing between the two companies as they cross
> at right angles.... the ROW would be the section that the two lines
parallel each other.
> 
> 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>