BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Misc historic CB&Q facts

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Misc historic CB&Q facts
From: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 23:20:30 -0600
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <buqgn6+rql3@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Gerald

Sorry my CO&P History is running 125 pages in the first rough draft.  Am
working on a Fox River branch piece for the Bulletin.  The maps of Ottawa
should be of much interest to some
SJH
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "gaedgar66" <vje68@hotmail.com>
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 12:58 AM
Subject: [CBQ] Misc historic CB&Q facts


> I was wandering thru some OER's looking for data in support of Rupert's
big Q frt car project and gleaned the following:
> Per May "25 qrtly Register (sumaries of all RR's, officials, etc).  The
Q's fleet of 1427 passenger cars was the 10th largest of all RR's
> (and does not include C&S/FtW&D).  In contrast, UP had 1396, GN had 1032,
NP 1021.  Q's was  2.04% of a national fleet of 69,961.
>
> In terms of locomotives, Q had 1968 - the 6th largest fleet; UP had 1959,
GN 1328 & NP 1428.  Q's was 2.57% of 76,671 nationally.
>
> Freight cars?  Q had the 7th largest group:  69,288 (plus 769 waycars,
1682 ballast cars & 2973 MOW) .  UP had 52,506; GN 53,104
>  & NP 47,692.  Of those Q frt cars: 29,968 box [27,905 plain box, 2053
auto box, 9 barrel & 1 furniture]; 27,079 open top [22,112 drop
> bottom gon's, 4961 flat botton gons & 6 hoppers]; 12,241 "others" [6515
sgl deck stock, 762 dbl deck stock, 3285 reefers, 1347 flats,
> 330 gen service tanks & 2 special service tanks].  Q's share nationally
was 2.61% of all revenue frt cars.  (not counting 264,983
> privately owned frt cars in addition to the 2,650,686 RR-owned)
>
> Now for a 1919 USRA OER; i.e. which smaller RR's were assigned to the Q by
the Fed's (larger RR's were given responsiblity for
> smaller RR's - if they were the only outside connection, the small RR was
theirs, if 2 or more larger RR's connected it was usually on
> a basis of who did the most business with each other).  The Q had 25
shortlines & interurbans assigned (I show date of eventual
> abandonment where known & location if not obvious - no, I wasn't when most
of these hit the dust either!)
>
> Aurora, Elgin & Chicago (became CA&E); Bevier & Southern; Chicago, Aurora
& DeKalb (Aurora); Creston, Winterset & Des Moines;
> Fox & ILlinois Union (Aurora); Galesburg Great Eastern; Galesburg &
Kewanee Electric; Gaklesburg, Rockford & Northern (became
> Hooppole, Yorktown & Tampico); Hannibal Connecting*; Illinois Central
Electric (Canton); Illinois Midland; Iowa Southern (Centerville);
>  Iowa & South Western (Clarinda); LaSalle & Bureau County; Lee County
Electric; Macomb, Industry & Littleton; Oregon & Interurban
> (Forest City, MO); Peoples Traction (Galesburg); Peru, LaSalle & Deer Park
(LaSalle, IL); Rock Island & Southern; St. Louis &
> Hannibal ("44); Shelby County ("28) & Shelby North West ("38 MO); Tabor &
Northern ("34 IA) and Wyoming ("52).   *Interstingly no
> interchange shown by the Q in their OER entry!
> The following small lines were assigned to a competitor of the Q: Billings
& Central Montana (NP); Muscatine, Burlington & Southern
> (RI); LaCrosse & South Eastern (GB&W)
> The following were not assigned to any RR: Rockport, Langon & Northern
("41); Sioux City Terminal; Davenport, Rock Island & NW;
> Union Terminal (St. Joe) and Chicago, Ottawa & Peoria.   The S.C. & Union
Terminal RR's were not shown in OER (an occaisional
> experience for very small RR's) but are shown on the Burlington's
interchange list.  The S.C. Terminal existed as an independent in to
> BN times as a matter of fact and former trackage than split between BN &
Milw.
>
> These small feeders to the Q, especially the ones wholly connected to the
Q, would all be good subjects for brief articles in the
> Burlington Bulletin.  We always need authors - what do you say???
Gerald
> Iow
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>