| To: | <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: CB&Q / Colorado & southern |
| From: | "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Dec 2002 17:36:34 -0600 |
| Cc: | "'Gordon Donaldson'" <GordonD@k...> |
| Disposition-notification-to: | "David E. Lotz" <dave_lotz@m...> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <A20E3B47EED7214598552E14152D4BA6081C86@f...> |
| Reply-to: | <dave_lotz@m...> |
| Return-receipt-to: | "David E. Lotz" <dave_lotz@m...> |
Here's a question for all of our BRHSlist Subsidiary fans. My guess would have been they used C&S cabooses on C&S trains regardless of the motive power's ownership. Would I be right? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Gordon Donaldson [mailto:GordonD@k...] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:07 PM To: brhs@n... Subject: CB&Q / Colorado & southern To whom it may concern: Would the CB&Q locomotives assigned to the C&S subsidiary have pulled C&S or CB&Q cabooses or either one? Any info on this would be appreciated. Thanks, Gordon Donaldson |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] RE: Picture of CB&Q train wreck, Ken Martin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | The best for the Holidays, JACKGP20 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] Re: "Herewith enclosed please find . . . ", Norman Andersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] RE: CB&Q / Colorado & southern, Russell Strodtz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |