| To: | <BRHSlist@egroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BRHSlist] "On Time?"/was CUS |
| From: | ufffam@a... |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:55:47 EDT |
In a message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2000 3:51:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time, amtrak347@a... writes: << In a message dated 7/25/00 12:50:27 PM Central Daylight Time, hold-on@s... writes: << We had a run of five days at 100% ontime and were working on number 6. >> Steve: What is Metra/BNSF's definition of the words "on-time"? SNIP Bob PS-I check my watch daily! Kind of like definition of "flying formation" in helicopters--same way, same day, huh? Bill Uffelman |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] "On Time?"/was CUS, amtrak347 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] CUS, hogger41 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] "On Time?"/was CUS, hold-on |
| Next by Thread: | Test, JACKGP20 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |